February 19, 2025
HIGH COURT (CHANCERY DIVISION) ENTERS JUDGMENT FOR THE CLAIMANTS FOR OVER £22.7 MILLION Arfan Khan represented the successful Claimants in Gangat v Jassat throughout the litigation instructed by Pandya Arbitration Global. The Claimants, former part-owners of the Jumbo Gr...more
News
THE NEWS PAGE CONTAINS DETAILS OF ARFAN'S RECENT CASES APPEARING IN THE PRESS.
Blog Archives
Archives
- March 2025 (1)
- February 2025 (2)
- November 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (1)
- May 2022 (1)
- November 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (1)
- November 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (1)
- November 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (1)
- November 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (2)
- April 2016 (8)
- November 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (2)
- December 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (1)
- October 2013 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- November 2009 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
Categories
- Account (1)
- Akinola (1)
- Apartheid (1)
- Appeal (6)
- Appeal by solicitor (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appeals by professionals (1)
- Article 8 – private life (1)
- Banking and Finance (4)
- Bankruptcy (2)
- Bankruptcy appeal (2)
- Bar Council – LSBU speech (1)
- Bar Council – Speech – Arfan Khan (1)
- Bar Council Black Interns Initiative (1)
- Breach of Fiduciary Duties (2)
- Chancery Division (4)
- Chancery Division Trial (1)
- Commercial & Public Law (3)
- Commercial and Chancery (13)
- Commercial and Chancery litigation (7)
- Commercial and International Law (4)
- Committal (1)
- Company (2)
- copyright infringement (1)
- Court of Appeal (16)
- Court of Appeal – Gangat v Jassat (1)
- Court of Appeal allows appeal in Yadly Marketing (1)
- Court of Appeal barrister (2)
- Court of Appeal decision (2)
- Cross appeal by SRA (1)
- Cross examination (1)
- Default Judgment – Practice & Procedure (1)
- Deportation order (1)
- Diana Loson (1)
- Diplomatic Immunity (1)
- Disciplinary tribunals (1)
- Employment Appeal Tribunal (2)
- EAT Appeal: Strike out (1)
- Race Discrimination (1)
- Sexual Harassment (1)
- Victimisation (1)
- EU law (4)
- EU Law barrister (2)
- EU Law direct effect (1)
- Exceptional Circumstances (1)
- GUIDANCE APPEAL (1)
- Guidance from the Court of Appeal (1)
- High Court (1)
- High Court Solar Park (1)
- Insolvency (2)
- Insolvency/Chancery (1)
- Judgment debt variation (1)
- Judgment millions (1)
- Judicial Appointments Commission (1)
- Judicial Review – Proportionality (1)
- Judicial Review appeals (1)
- Judicial sitting (1)
- Leading Counsel (1)
- Part 18 application – Chancery Commercial (1)
- Partnership (1)
- Phonographic Performance (1)
- Phonographic Performance Judgment (1)
- Practice – Court of Appeal (2)
- Practice and Procedure (1)
- Privy Council appeals (1)
- Procedural irregularity (1)
- Professional misconduct – Legal test (1)
- Property litigation (1)
- Public Interest Intervention (1)
- Public International Law (1)
- Public International Lw (2)
- Public Law – Court of Appeal (5)
- Race discrimination (1)
- Revocation (1)
- Sex discrimination (1)
- Sexual misconduct by professionals (1)
- Solicitors disciplinary appeal (1)
- Solicitors Regulation Authority (1)
- Specialist advocate (1)
- State Immunity and Public International Law (1)
- State Immunity (1)
- State Immunity Barrister (2)
- State Immunity Court of Appeal (2)
- Statelessness (1)
- Statutory Consultations and disclosure (1)
- Statutory limitation periods (1)
- summary judgment set aside test (1)
- Supreme Court (3)
- CPR (1)
- Supreme Court barrister (1)
- Tax and Chancery Chamber (1)
- Test for appeals (1)
- The Lawyer (1)
- Times Lawyer of the Week 2009 (1)
- Trust and Property appeal (1)
- Uncategorized (21)
- Witness evidence (1)